Las Vegas Bankruptcy Help

Your bankruptcy attorney has many powerful to help you keep property while eliminating debt. One tool is lien avoidance, which is available to both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 debtors. The general rule in bankruptcy is that debts secured by a lien must be paid or the property must be surrendered to the creditor. However, under certain circumstances, a lien can be legally avoided without losing the property.

The Bankruptcy Code identifies two different types of liens that may be avoided during bankruptcy: (1) a judicial lien; and (2) a non-possessory, non-purchase money security interest in household goods or tools of the trade. Furthermore, to qualify for avoidance the debtor must be able to apply a bankruptcy exemption (a legal allowance to the debtor to protect property from creditors) to the property securing the debt.

Clear as mud, right?

Let's make it a little clearer: first, judicial liens are judgments and garnishments caused by a court order or judicial process. If your property is subject to a debt imposed by a court order, it may be possible to avoid the lien during bankruptcy. Statutory liens, like tax liens, are not avoidable in Chapter 7, but may be avoidable in Chapter 13.

Second, a non-possessory, non-purchase money security interest is simply a lien that you gave a creditor against property that you owned prior to incurring the debt and did not acquire using money from the creditor. A typical example is a personal bank loan secured by your television and/or other household items.

Finally, to qualify for lien avoidance, the debtor must be able to apply a legal exemption to the property. For instance, if you own a television worth $500 used as collateral for a $1,000 personal loan, you may be able to apply a legal exemption to protect the television and avoid the lien against it. Once the lien is avoided, the status of the debt changes from secured to unsecured and is likely discharged at the end of the bankruptcy case.

Additionally, if the legal exemption does not protect all of the value of the property, the lien may be reduced to the extent the lien secures the property. Using the above example, if the television is worth $500, but the debtor is only able to exempt $250 of its value, the creditor's lien would be reduced in value from $1,000 to $250 (the amount of non-exempt equity in the television).

To avoid a lien the debtor's attorney files a motion with the bankruptcy court alleging that the creditor's lien is impairing the debtor's exemption. Typically these motions are uncontested and are granted without hearing.

It is important that you provide your bankruptcy attorney with documentation for all of your loans. The attorneys at Haines and Krieger can avoid certain liens during the bankruptcy that will safeguard your property after your bankruptcy discharge.  Contact us today to discuss your options with a free consultation.

The automatic stay is a powerful bankruptcy protection that immediately stops nearly all creditor action against a debtor. The automatic stay is a temporary injunction against debt collection and is meant to give the debtor a “breathing spell” from his creditors. The automatic stay permits the debtor to attempt a repayment or reorganization plan, or simply to be relieved of the financial pressures that drove him into bankruptcy.

This protection is immediate and “automatic” upon filing a bankruptcy petition - no hearing is necessary. The stay is a legal injunction ordered by the bankruptcy court that prohibits a creditor with a claim that arose before commencement of the bankruptcy case from taking many actions, including:

• contacting the debtor to request payment (stops collection calls)
• initiating or continuing a lawsuit against the debtor (stops lawsuits)
• enforcing a judgment against the debtor (stops wage garnishments)
• repossessing personal property or foreclosing on real estate (stops repossessions and foreclosure)

While the automatic stay is immediate, it is not permanent. The stay can be contested by a creditor and lifted by the bankruptcy court after notice and a hearing. There are also a few exceptions to the automatic stay protections, for instance: the automatic stay does not prevent criminal prosecution. Likewise the automatic stay does not stop lawsuits to establish or modify alimony, maintenance, or support.

Individuals that file for bankruptcy receive this powerful legal injunction against creditor actions. However, the automatic stay is just one weapon in your bankruptcy attorney’s arsenal. Your attorney can use the power of the bankruptcy laws to help you make the best decisions for your family’s future financial health. If you are struggling with debt, consult with one of the experienced bankruptcy attorneys at Haines and Krieger and learn how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you. Contact us for a free consultation today.

A Nevada resident's financial situation is often desperate by the time a bankruptcy is filed. In some circumstances the rent is past due and the debtor is facing eviction. Fortunately, the bankruptcy laws can help many Nevada debtors stay in their homes, at least temporarily.

Generally, when you file a bankruptcy petition all collection actions are automatically stayed. The purpose of this stay is to give you some breathing room and time to sort out your financial difficulties. If you are behind on rent payments, the bankruptcy automatic stays the commencement or continuation of an eviction action. The automatic stay prohibits your landlord from any attempt to collect rents that accrued prior to the bankruptcy filing date. Your landlord may not write or call you in an effort to collect these rents, and may not start or continue a lawsuit to evict you.

The bankruptcy automatic stay will not relieve you from your obligation to pay rent after the bankruptcy filing date. If you fall behind on your rent payments after the bankruptcy is filed, your landlord may evict you regardless of the bankruptcy, but cannot seek payment of past rents. If you are not behind on rents at the time the bankruptcy case is filed, your landlord is not a creditor and will not receive notice of your bankruptcy filing. However, you must account for any rent deposit on your bankruptcy schedules.

In some circumstances a landlord may complain to the bankruptcy court that the tenant is endangering the property or using controlled substances illegally on the property. The landlord must file a certification to the bankruptcy court and the tenant has 15 days to respond. The court must hold a hearing within 10 days. If the landlord is successful in this complaint, the court will lift the automatic stay and allow the eviction process to continue.

If your landlord has obtained a judgment for possession and order of eviction before you file bankruptcy, the legal process is more complex. You must deposit one month of rent to the bankruptcy court immediately upon filing the bankruptcy petition along with a certification stating that your landlord’s judgment permits you to stay in the premises upon satisfaction of the entire judgment amount. This filing stays the eviction process for thirty days. If you wish to remain longer, the amount stated in the judgment for possession must be paid within the thirty day period.

Bankruptcy can stop a Las Vegas rental eviction and give you time to move or make arrangements to stay. If you are facing eviction from your Nevada rental home and contemplating bankruptcy, discuss your situation with one of the experienced bankruptcy attorneys at Haines and Krieger.  Contact us today for a free consultation.

Many students are unable to attend college without federal financial aid. Fortunately, a bankruptcy filing does not affect a student’s ability to obtain need-based financial aid. For most students that means Pell Grants and Stafford Loans, both subsidized and unsubsidized.  Your credit is not considered in determining your financial need to receive Pell Grants and Stafford Loans and your bankruptcy filing does not disqualify you from receiving need-based financial aid. Pell Grants and Stafford Loans are the two most common forms of financial aid to undergraduate college students.

Stafford Loans during a Chapter 13 bankruptcy presents a problem for the student. You will need permission from the bankruptcy trustee and bankruptcy court to incur additional debt. These requests are handled on a case-by-case basis, so consult with your bankruptcy attorney if you want to take loans to attend school during a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

Credit-based financial aid is a different story. This type of financial aid includes student loans from private lenders such as Sallie Mae. Applying for credit-based loans is the same as applying for an unsecured personal loan. Your credit history is considered and your bankruptcy will play a part in the decision to give you the loan.

Your credit is also considered if you are a parent applying for a parent loan like the PLUS (Parental Loan for Undergraduate Students) Loan and the Graduate PLUS (a loan for Graduate students) Loan. These federally guaranteed parent loans are credit based and federal regulations state that a parent with a bankruptcy within the past five years is automatically disqualified from obtaining a PLUS Loan for his or her child, unless there were extenuating circumstances or the borrower obtains a creditworthy endorser.  However, if you are denied a PLUS Loan, your child qualifies for increased unsubsidized Stafford loan limits. Stafford loans remain in forbearance while the student attends school, while a PLUS Loan is subject to immediate repayment.

If you are a student or parent who needs money for school after a bankruptcy, speak with your student financial aid advisor and your bankruptcy attorney. Bankruptcy can help eliminate your personal debt and free money for college, or college loan repayment.  The attorneys at Haines and Krieger can explain the bankruptcy process and your legal rights.

During a Chapter 13 bankruptcy you pay your creditors in accordance with your ability to pay.  Some creditors receive 100% of the debt, and others may receive a small sum or nothing at all.  The Bankruptcy Code establishes a priority of debt repayment.

Administrative claims must be paid 100% and include your filing fee, the trustee’s compensation (3% to 10% of each monthly payment), and your attorney’s fees.  Other debts must be paid 100% during the debtor’s bankruptcy including alimony and child support, most tax debts, and mortgage arrears if you intend to keep you home.

The lowest category of debt repayment is unsecured creditors.  The amount paid to unsecured creditors (e.g. medical bills, credit cards, and unsecured personal loans) is determined by several factors including (1) the amount of your nonexempt assets; (2) your disposable income; and (3) the length of your plan.

The length of your plan and amount of your disposable income are largely determined by the Bankruptcy Means Test.  The Means Test was the subject of a recent United States Supreme Court case: Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. Lanning.  The issue in Hamilton is how a bankruptcy court calculates your ability to pay creditors during the bankruptcy case.

The 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy Code included a requirement that Chapter 13 debtors commit all "projected disposable income" to the repayment plan.  Confusion arose over whether Congress meant to determine this amount through a mechanical approach, by averaging the debtor's income for the past six months, or whether the determination is “forward looking” and should consider the debtor’s future ability to pay.

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for an 8-1 majority, said the “forward looking” approach is correct.  The forward-looking approach starts with the debtor's average monthly disposable income for the past six months multiplied by the number of months in a debtor's plan.  This figure is ordinarily the debtor's projected disposable income.  However, in some cases, the Court has authority to review the debtor's actual and present monthly income in order to calculate the debtor’s ability to pay debts during the plan period.

The Hamilton case will have great impact on Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases and places the power to determine a fair and affordable Chapter 13 payment plan in the hands of the bankruptcy court judges.  If you are in need of bankruptcy relief, but fear that you will be forced to pay a monthly sum you can’t afford, get the facts from the experienced bankruptcy attorneys at Haines and Krieger.  Bankruptcy is not a debtor’s prison and has helped millions get a fresh financial start. Contact us today for a free consultation.

During a Chapter 7 bankruptcy all unsecured debts are discharged. Debts that are secured by collateral (e.g. car loans) must be paid or the collateral must be returned to the lender. Occasionally an individual considering Chapter 7 bankruptcy will own a vehicle that is worth less than what is owed. This situation is often referred to as “upside down” and usually involves a late model vehicle that has depreciated faster than the person has paid on the loan. It doesn’t make any sense to pay for something that is “upside down,” but often an individual needs to keep the vehicle for transportation to work and for family use.

Fortunately, a provision of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy code allows an individual to keep a vehicle and pay only its current market value. This process is called “redemption.” During a redemption the value of the vehicle is determined (either by agreement between the debtor and creditor or by the bankruptcy judge after a hearing) and a court order is issued directing the creditor to accept a sum from the debtor in exchange for a release of its lien. In plain terms the lender is paid a lump sum and the lien on the vehicle is released. For example, a debtor that owes $15,000 on an auto that is worth $10,000 will only pay $10,000.

Unfortunately, the payment must be made in a one-time lump sum to the lender at the time of the redemption order. If the debtor is unable to pay for the vehicle, there are finance companies that make redemption loans for debtors in bankruptcy. Before making a redemption loan these finance companies require a loan application and certain assurances of repayment. The interest rate can be high for a redemption loan, however the resulting monthly payment is often lower than the original payment. It is important to carefully consider all of the advantages and disadvantages before making a decision to redeem a vehicle:

Advantages of a redemption loan:

• Retention of the vehicle;
• Vehicle is no longer “upside down;”
• The creditor cannot repossess the vehicle;
• Usually results in a lower monthly payment.

Disadvantages of a redemption loan:

• High interest rate.

Redemption is not the only option for keeping a vehicle after a bankruptcy. A skilled bankruptcy attorney can explain all of your options and help you obtain the best deal for your family. Contact Haines and Krieger for a free consultation. 

The Bankruptcy Code directs the Chapter 7 debtor to file a statement of intention with the bankruptcy court within 30 days after the petition filing, or on or before the 341 Meeting of Creditors, whichever is earlier. A statement of intention advises the court, the bankruptcy trustee, and your creditors of how the debtor intends to treat secured collateral, like a car or home, in the bankruptcy.

The Bankruptcy Code also requires that the Chapter 7 debtor perform on that intention within 45 days after filing the statement. The Bankruptcy Code allows the debtor to choose one of the following: (1) surrender the collateral back to the creditor and discharge any personal liability; (2) reaffirm the debt and retain the collateral in exchange for continued personal liability on the original debt; or (3) redeem the collateral by paying the current fair market value in a lump sum.

Prior to the overhaul of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, a Chapter 7 statement of intention had little relevance.  Now the statement of intention can mean the difference between keeping and losing an automobile or other secured property. 

Failure to timely file or perform on a statement of intention causes the automatic stay to be lifted and the property is longer a part of the bankruptcy case. In some cases, a purchase agreement may contain an ipso facto clause which creates a default on the loan by filing bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code expressly nullifies ipso facto clauses, but only for property of the bankruptcy estate. Most courts find that ipso facto clauses are enforceable under state law when property is no longer a part of the bankruptcy estate. 

Let me restate this situation in plain English: if you file bankruptcy and do not file or timely perform on a statement of intention, the property is no longer protected by the bankruptcy and can be repossessed by the creditor, even though you are current on the loan. This situation recently was discussed in a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case, Dumont v. Ford Motor Credit Company.

If you have an auto loan or other secured item you want to keep, discuss your options with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. The attorneys at Haines and Krieger can help you reach the right decision for you and your family.  Contact us today for a free consultation.

The Better Business Bureau recently issued a warning to consumers regarding the misleading practices of debt settlement companies. This warning comes after receiving more than 3,500 complaints since the start of the recession in 2007. The BBB reports that many individuals paid hundreds of dollars in upfront fees to debt settlement companies, but only fell deeper into debt after the process failed.  

In an article posted to the BBB website, Stephen A. Cox, President and CEO of the Council of Better Business Bureaus said, “The debt settlement industry is flourishing and many families are being lured into believing that debt settlement is an easy fix and that their credit card debt will just disappear.” Mr. Cox went on to say that “the truth is that the process doesn’t work for many consumers, it has potentially serious negative consequences, and should primarily be used as a last ditch effort[.]”

Debt settlement companies typically offer to negotiate a settlement for a fee. Unscrupulous companies mislead consumers with promises of large savings and quick resolution. The truth is that it is difficult for a non-attorney to obtain a debt reduction of 50% or more. Additionally, these types of settlements are only available with a one-time payment. Most debt settlement companies require an up-front fee and ask the consumer to make payments into a savings account held by the debt settlement company for future settlement. During the process of six months to a year that it takes to build up the account, the consumer is at risk of garnishments and lawsuits.

In some cases fraudulent debt settlement companies have stolen from the consumer accounts, or refused to return funds. In other cases the consumer is driven deeper into debt when the debt settlement company is unable to settle the debt.

Unlike debt settlement, the bankruptcy process is a legal process supervised by a federal judge and the U.S. Department of Justice. Your agent is a licensed attorney throughout the process. There are no hidden fees and you pay only what you are able to afford. At the end of the bankruptcy process your debts are discharged and you receive a financial fresh start ordered by the bankruptcy court.

If you are struggling with debt and need financial relief, speak with an experienced attorney and discover how the federal bankruptcy laws can help you and your family. Don’t be a victim of a debt relief scam.  Contact the attorneys at Haines and Krieger for a free consultation.

The federal bankruptcy code states that a debtor may obtain a discharge of a government-sponsored student loan only if repaying the loan would impose an “undue hardship” on the debtor and his dependents. Most bankruptcy courts interpret “undue hardship” as meaning that the debtor cannot repay the loan and maintain a minimal standard of living. As a result of this very high bar, it is rare that a student loan is discharged during bankruptcy.

Consequently, many bankruptcy debtors are caught in a student loan trap of being unable to pay on the student loan and the interest continues to accrue. While discharging the student loan may not be possible, there are options for dealing with a student loan during and after bankruptcy.

First, the student loan lender or collection agency is strictly forbidden from engaging in any collection action during the bankruptcy. This protection (known as the “automatic stay”) may last from a few months during a Chapter 7 to several years during a Chapter 13 repayment plan. Interest may continue to accrue and will be tacked-on at the end of the bankruptcy case.

Second, if the student loan was not defaulted prior to the bankruptcy filing (meaning no payment for more than 270 days), the account will usually be re-aged and is considered current upon the conclusion of the bankruptcy case. This is a good time to negotiate with the lender for a payment plan you can afford. If the student loan was defaulted prior to the bankruptcy, the lender may offer a loan rehabilitation program.

Finally, your student loan lender has many repayment options after your bankruptcy case ends, including the Income Based Repayment Plan which limits your loan repayment to 15% of your income and offers loan forgiveness after 25 years of repayment (or 10 years for public service employees). 

If you are struggling with student loan debt, speak to the experienced bankruptcy attorneys at Haines and Krieger and discuss your options. Your attorney can explain the many ways for dealing with student loan debt and can help you decide on a course of action that is best for you and your family.  Contact us for a free consultation.

Top Ten Things Your Bankruptcy Attorney Hates To Hear

10.  “I know I told you that I only expected a small tax refund, but my accountant says I’m getting back a large refund! Isn’t that great?” No, its not. Your attorney can protect your property, but unexpected large cash sums are difficult to protect during a bankruptcy. Generally it is advisable to receive (and spend) your income tax refund prior to filing your bankruptcy case. 

9.  “Before I came to see you I paid a debt counselor a lot of money.”  Individuals can lose thousands in fraudulent debt counseling. While there are legitimate programs that can obtain positive results, many are just plain scams and end up making matters much worse for you and your family.

8.  “I cashed out my retirement account and paid off my credit cards.” Retirement accounts are generally protectable assets in a bankruptcy and beyond the reach of most creditors, while credit card debt is typically the easiest type to discharge.

7.  “I paid off my car with my tax refund.” Having too much equity in a vehicle will result in payments to the bankruptcy trustee. In other words you first paid for your car, and then you must pay the trustee for the non-exempt equity in the car. That means you pay TWICE for the same car! 

6.  “I repaid a loan to a family member before coming to see you.” Payments to a family member prior to filing bankruptcy is a big mistake. He or she may be forced to turn over the payment to pay your creditors. Of course you want to pay your family member, and you can certainly do so, but let a qualified professional help you do it the right way. 

5.  “I transferred my house/car/etc. to my mother to protect it.” Another regrettable mistake. By trying to protect an asset without your attorney’s help you could actually lose any protection it might otherwise be entitled to.

4. “I took out a payday loan after our consultation to pay for the bankruptcy.” Incurring a debt with no intention to repay is not only a non-dischargeable debt in bankruptcy, it could land you in criminal trouble! 

3.    “I went on a shopping spree with my credit cards before I came to see you.” This seldom happens because most people have better common sense. As a general rule the shopper will be paying that money back to the credit card company.

2.  “I just got my chapter 7 discharge and I found out my grandmother left me a large inheritance.” This news is sad in many ways: not only is the loss of a loved one a tragic event, but the bankruptcy court may order you to turn over the inheritance.

1.  “I didn’t tell my attorney this, but. . .” The worst news of all! Always answer your attorney’s questions honestly and completely. Hidden assets or transfers can prevent you from receiving a bankruptcy discharge and may result in federal criminal charges.

One of the most common and important questions asked by a client during the initial bankruptcy consultation is, “Can I keep my house?” 

The happy answer is, “Yes.” However, every client’s case is different and requires a skilled and experience attorney to evaluate your situation and help you choose the appropriate debt relief process.

The first question is whether there is equity in your home. Every state allows the debtor to exempt home equity from creditors during bankruptcy. Home equity is simply the difference between the amount that is owed and what the property is worth. If you have more equity in your home than can be exempted, you may need to consider either a Chapter 13 repayment plan or a non-bankruptcy option for debt repayment. In a Chapter 13 the debtor pays the amount equal to the non-exempt home equity to unsecured creditors (like credit cards and medical bills) over a three to five year period. If Chapter 13 is not a feasible option, the debtor may want to consider borrowing against the home equity to pay unsecured creditors.

The second issue is whether you can afford to keep the home by making the monthly payments. A home mortgage is a secured debt which must be paid or you must surrender the property back to the mortgage holder. When circumstances have changed and you can no loner afford to keep your home, the bankruptcy laws can help you to leave on your terms without any lingering debt.

In some cases a third issue is present: the debt is more than the value of the house. In those cases bankruptcy may help either through lien stripping an entirely unsecured second mortgage, or by encouraging the mortgage holder to negotiate for a modification and reduction in principle. Typically the mortgage holder does not want your property, and is usually willing to discuss payment options once a bankruptcy case is filed.

Finally, some debtors are facing foreclosure from an uncooperative mortgage holder. A Chapter 13 bankruptcy can be used to force the mortgage holder to accept payments that cure mortgage arrears over three to five years.

There are many options available for saving your home. The attorneys at Haines and krieger can discuss the pros and cons of each and help you decide which option is best for your family. Use the federal law to your advantage and discover how the bankruptcy laws can help you keep your home.  Contact us for a free consultation today.

Around the country courts are questioning the standing of MERS to assert legal rights in foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings. Many courts are finding that Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or “MERS,” is not a legal mortgage holder for lenders, investors and their loan servicers, and are invalidating bankruptcy claims or foreclosure processes.

On its website MERS describes itself:

MERS is an innovative process that simplifies the way mortgage ownership and servicing rights are originated, sold and tracked. Created by the real estate finance industry, MERS eliminates the need to prepare and record assignments when trading residential and commercial mortgage loans.

Since the mortgage bubble burst, MERS has come under increasing attack in state and federal courts. Some courts (most notably in Kansas, Florida, and New York) have found that MERS does not have standing to assert mortgage rights because it is a mere nominee, and not a mortgage assignee (an assignment of a mortgage without the debt transfers nothing. 55 Am. Jur. 2d, Mortgages § 1002). Additionally, MERS routinely skips legally required processes when a mortgage is transferred.

MERS is not the beneficiary of a Deed of Trust, and has no ownership or possession of a promissory note. Therefore, many courts are finding noncompliance with state laws. Recently one bankruptcy court in the State of New York invalidated a bankruptcy claim by MERS when the company could not show how it had standing in the case.

Many bankruptcy attorneys are demanding proof of assignment and documents establishing a paper trail for their client’s mortgage. In many cases MERS is unable to provide this information; much like collection companies often cannot prove a debt. Original documents, recorded deeds, payment history, and executed assignments seem to be inconsequential matters to the MERS powerhouse. Fortunately, MERS is now under attack and accused of not following legal processes. It will be very interesting to see how the state and federal appellate courts address the MERS debacle.

If you are dealing with an uncooperative mortgage company and need assistance saving your home, speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney and discuss your options. There are many legal options available. Let Haines and Krieger help you determine the best choice for your family.  Contact us today for a free consultation.

Most of the debt collection industry is based on bully tactics. Each stage of the collection process is designed to intimidate and harass until the individual simply surrenders and pays the debt. Collectors send embarrassing letters in pink envelopes marked “URGENT!” or “IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED!” They make scores of phone calls at home and work, until you are afraid to pick up your own phone.

Even when there is a valid defense, a credit card company will sometimes seek to bury the defendant with the enormity of its size. Take for example the recent Palm Beach County, Florida, case of Capital One Bank USA, NA v Pincus. Capital One sued Steven Pincus for a credit card debt of $803.95. Pincus offered to settle the debt for a few hundred dollars, and Capital One refused. Pincus then hired an attorney to defend. Capital One responded with a barrage of court filings that ran up Pincus’s legal expense tab to over $100,000.

Pincus moved for summary judgment and dismissal claiming the lawsuit was barred by the statute of limitations. Pincus asserted that the Capital One cardholder agreement states that Virginia law shall control, and, since the contract was not signed by either party, whatever agreement existed between Pincus and Capital One must be an oral contract. Pincus further argued that since the statute of limitations for oral contracts in Virginia is three years and since Capital One’s lawsuit was filed three and a half years after the date of the last transaction, Capital One’s case is time barred. Capital One defended by arguing that Florida law and its five year statute of limitations should control because Florida was the state where the contract was made.

The Palm Beach County Court found that Virginia law controlled and the credit card agreement was an oral contract based on Virginia law. The opinion cited several similar Florida cases finding the choice of law provision in a cardholder agreement applies to a statute of limitations defense. In granting Pincus’s summary judgment motion and dismissing the case, the Florida court opinion said the credit card company is “‘master of its complaint’ and cannot disavow the choice of law provision contained in the document it attaches to its Complaint so it can take advantage of the longer statute of limitations.”

The Pincus case did not end there. Pincus and his attorney filed a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuit in federal court against Capital One’s attorneys to recover his attorney fees (Capital One, as an original creditor, is exempt from the FDCPA, but collection attorneys are not). The case was settled after contentious litigation for $120,000.

The moral of the story is “Don’t be bullied!” If you are sued for a credit card debt, seek legal advice from an experienced debt defense attorney. Many bankruptcy attorneys are experts in debt defense and can explain your legal options. Let Haines and Krieger help you with your debt problem by contacting us for a free consultation.

In an episode of television’s “The Office,” the main character Michael Scott makes a misguided attempt to resolve his debt problems by publically stating, “I. . . declare. . . bankruptcy!” Video clips of this funny episode can be found on YouTube.

Back in the real world, declaring bankruptcy is not nearly as public, or as simple, as shouting out “I declare bankruptcy!” The bankruptcy process begins with an accounting of your income, expenses, assets, and debts. The debtor is required to use approved forms for this financial accounting. A copy of these forms can be found on the U.S. Courts website, and a general description of each form that must be filed in all consumer debtor Chapter 7 and 13 cases is provided below.

The Voluntary Petition is three pages long and is the formal declaration of bankruptcy. Filing the Voluntary Petition begins the bankruptcy process and imposes the automatic stay which will generally stop action by creditors to collect debts.

Schedule A is a list of real property.

Schedule B is a list of personal property.

Schedule C is a list of property the debtor claims as exempt.

Schedule D is a list of creditors holding secured claims.

Schedule E is a list of creditors holding unsecured priority claims.

Schedule F is a list of creditors holding unsecured nonpriority claims.

Schedule G is a list of the debtor’s executory contracts and unexpired leases.

Schedule H is a list of codebtors in the bankruptcy.

Schedule I lists the debtor’s monthly income.

Schedule J lists the debtor’s monthly expenses.

The debtor must sign a Declaration that the above schedules are accurate to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief.

The debtor must file a Statement of Financial Affairs. This form provides a summary of the debtor's financial history, transactions, and operations over certain time periods before the case is filed. There are 18 separate items on this form:
 

1. Income from Employment or Operation of Business
2. Income Other than from Employment or Operation of Business
3. Payments to Creditors
4. Suits, Administrative Proceedings, Executions, Garnishments, and Attachments
5. Repossessions, Foreclosures, and Returns
6. Assignments and Receiverships
7. Gifts
8. Losses
9. Payments Related to Debt Counseling or Bankruptcy
10.   Other Transfers
11.   Closed Financial Accounts
12.   Safe Deposit Boxes
13.   Setoffs
14.   Property Held for Another Person
15.   Prior Address of Debtor
16.   Spouses and Former Spouses
17.   Environmental Information
18.   Nature, Location, and Name of Business

Finally, the debtor must file either a Statement of Current Monthly Income and Means Test Calculation in a Chapter 7 case, or a Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income in a Chapter 13 case.

The success of your bankruptcy largely depends on the accuracy of these forms and the skill that your bankruptcy attorney applies in crafting these financial reports. Don’t leave your financial future to chance! Let Haines and Krieger help you with your financial problems and advise you on the best course of action.  Contact us today for a free consultation.
 

Happy April from Haines & Krieger’s Las Vegas Foreclosure Round-Up, where we look at the latest Las Vegas foreclosure news:

1.     New HAFA Guidelines Help Performance Marketing America Provide Hope for Short Sales in Las Vegas (PR-USA.net)

This April 5^th, the federal government’s Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) goes into effect.  These guidelines accelerate the short sale process for debtors’ principal residences with mortgages predating 2009. 

Comment:  It's worth mentioning that Haines & Krieger has substantial experience helping Las Vegas homeowners with short sales and is well prepared to continue to help with the newly streamlined short sale process.

2.     Underwater Homeowners Leave Behind Mortgages, but Lenders Can Still Come Calling (Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Homeowners grapple with paying the negative equity on a depreciated home versus taking the credit score hit by engaging in “strategic default.”  If opting for the latter, they should beware, for Nevada is a recourse state, meaning lenders can go after former homeowners years after foreclosures, short sales, and bank-approved sales. 

Comment:  For this reason, we strongly recommend consulting with an experienced bankruptcy/foreclosure attorney before proceeding with a strategic default.  Haines & Krieger offers free consultations where you can get advice and perspective on your situation and figure out the best strategy for your situation.

3.     Investors Swoop In Again, but Do They Bring A Stigma? (Las Vegas Sun)

Rather than buying homes to flip them at a higher price, investors are coming to Las Vegas to buy homes and then rent them.  Nearby homeowners are concerned that renters are unwilling to make the same personal investment in houses as owners.  On the other hand, investors claim that a rented house is better for nearby property values than a vacant one.

4.     Retail Index Places Las Vegas Near Bottom (Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Investors are also swooping in on Las Vegas’ retail properties.  The poor economy is weakening sales, which is leading to shops closing, so like the housing market, the empty retail space is for sale at discount prices for investors.

Comment:  Haines & Kriegers attorneys excel at commercial loan modifications.  Please feel free to contact us for a free initial consultation to discuss your situation.
 

Hep Stop Foreclosure Las Vegas
If your'e facing foreclosure and need good bankruptcy attorneys in Las Vegas, please contact us for a free foreclosure consultation.

Haines & Krieger attorneys have been at the forefront of helping Las Vegas residents deal with foreclosure problems and getting back on their feet.  So get in touch and let us help you figure out your best options for fighting foreclosure.

Many clients are intimidated when meeting a bankruptcy attorney for the first time. They fear that they will be asked judgmental questions and have to justify their financial distress. They fear that they will not be able to answer the attorney’s questions and somehow not qualify for bankruptcy and the relief they desperately need. 

Nothing could be further from the truth. 

The first thing you will discover when meeting your bankruptcy attorney is that your attorney is a good listener. You are the world’s foremost expert concerning your own finances, and your attorney is there to learn about your case from you.

The second thing you will discover is your attorney’s compassion. Bankruptcy attorneys really do care about their clients. Bankruptcy is one of the few areas of the law where the legal process is designed to have a positive result for the client. The goal of your bankruptcy attorney is to ensure that you are in a better financial position at the end of the case than you were at the beginning. Bankruptcy lawyers are caring individuals that have an active interest in your future success.

The third thing you will notice is how your attorney is able to quickly summarize what seems like an overwhelming problem into simple concepts. Your attorney will break down your finances into four categories: assets, debts, income, and expenses. From there you and your attorney can discuss what must be done to improve your financial situation.

Finally, you will be impressed with the clarity your attorney has for repairing your financial problem. A skilled bankruptcy attorney spends years studying, training, and gaining practical experience just so your case can be resolved quickly and efficiently. Bankruptcy law is all about paths to recovery and your attorney will guide you along a path that is best for you.

When you first meet your bankruptcy attorney, discuss your case openly and honestly. You will find that your attorney is dedicated to helping you attain a financial fresh start and improve your family’s finances.  At Haines and Krieger, we look forward to getting to know you and helping you with your fresh start.  Contact us today for a free consultation.